Editors/Authors   Librarians   Newsletter   Site Tour   Subscriptions   A-Z Index   About   Contact Us   Help 
Log In | Log In via Athens
 
Disable Autosuggest
The Rational Clinical Examination
David L. Simel, Drummond Rennie
Breast Cancer
Mary B. Barton, Russell Harris, Suzanne W. Fletcher
Accuracy


Topics Discussed: breast, breast cancer, criterion standard comparisons (diagnostic tests), palpation, physical breast examination, probability, sensitivity, specificity, women's health

Excerpt: "To determine its accuracy as a screening test, CBE must be compared with a criterion standard. Mammography cannot be that standard because cancers that are missed by mammography can be found on CBE. Histology alone also cannot be the standard because tissue will never be obtained from all women whose abnormalities are detected by CBE. Even less likely is the histologic examination of breasts that are normal on examination to determine specificity. A compromise criterion standard is to follow up all screened women for a defined period; women diagnosed as having breast cancer must have histologic proof, and all cases of breast cancer among women screened during the follow-up period must be counted. This admittedly imperfect standard nevertheless is so stringent that few studies of breast cancer screening22,25,32,33,67,68 meet it.The sensitivity of the CBE is approximately 54%. The specificity of the examination is about 94%.Clinical breast examination duration correlated significantly with lump detection accuracy in experiments involving silicone breast models. In 5 studies, mean examination duration was always longer for examiners with higher sensitivity (Table 8-5). The highest recorded sensitivity in human studies (69%) was achieved in the NBSS, in which examiners took between 5 and 10 minutes to complete examination of both breasts.21On average, younger women have denser breasts that make lump detection more difficult, whereas in older women, the breast becomes more fatty, making lump detection easier.78 In one referral population, examiners' sensitivity was 86% among women aged 20 through 49 years and 96% among women aged 50 years and older.59 Silicone models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue improved sensitivity over that in models simulating premenopausal breast tissue (64% vs 51%).75 Two large trials came to a different conclusion, albeit among women in narrowly defined age ranges. The BCDDP found CBE sensitivity of 53% among women between 40 and 49 years and 48% among women between 50 and 59 years.22 The NBSS79 reported higher CBE sensitivity in women aged 40 through 49 years (68%) compared with those aged 50 through 59 years (63%), among women receiving both mammography and CBE. Further study is needed on this issue...."
Log in to read the full chapter:
Subscriber Log In
Username:
Password:
Forgot your username/password?
Or  
Get full access to JAMAevidence two ways:
Subscribe to JAMAevidence
JAMAevidence is a subscription-
based website dedicated to the learning, teaching, and practicing of evidence-based medicine.
Pay Per View
Timed access to all of JAMAevidence
24 hours for $29.95
48 hours for $49.95
Copyright © American Medical Association. All rights reserved.  |  JAMA  |  McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC.
Privacy Notice. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Notice. Additional Credits and Copyright Information.
Your IP address is 54.234.42.16